Watch this video.
Thanks for this Bill. I am going to put it up at CotM.
This is a serious issue so in the spirit of open debate, here are a few links to articles that dispute Dr. Evans claims.http://bit.ly/lMpN04http://bit.ly/f7X8Chttp://bit.ly/IOMBjmThere is plenty of evidence that disputes Evans' claims and credentials. Worth looking at if you're truly interested in an honest discussion about climate change.
Reply to JeffThose citations are childish by comparison to the presentation.Check this earlier post:The role of H2O
Thanks for that post. (The presenter should have used a microphone for better sound production). In my opinion, the simplest evidence that we don't have a problem is the fact that we haven't had runaway global warming in the past, even when CO2 levels were 10 times the current level (i.e. when the dinosaurs roamed the earth). This fact supports the notion that the climate is a self-regulating system. No one in the catastophic global warming camp has provided a mechanism that explains why it would be different this time. They can't point to their computer models because they have been discredited. They don't pass the only test that matters; actual observations don't support their output, as discussed in the presentation. As the presenter indicated, when the Earth warms up, whether it's due to natural or manmade causes, the excess heat is radiated into space, as one would expect of a self-regulating system with negative feedbacks. The climate models are wrong because they assume global climate is a system with positive (self-reinforcing = runaway) feedbacks.
Jeff the very fact you are using a computer proves that you don't beleive man made global warming, if you did you would'nt, so when you look in the mirror you can live with the fact you are a fraud
The only thing running away is the notion that the climate change is a fraud. Word is getting out and it's only a matter of time before it's generally accepted. Maybe once this is all over we can examine our belief system around science and go back to the concept that a central tenant of scientific research is debate about what theories the data supports. Seriously the way global warming scare mongers have behaved is an embarrassing to their field. They should be ashamed.
Bill, even though my last comment was relevant to your post and respectful in tone, you have removed it. Why?
I didn't remove your comment. I responded to your email.Have you any comments on the demonstrated effect of Water on heat transfer (thousands of times more) compared to CO2 from my citation?
Post a Comment